California’s Sex Ed Curriculum Determined Egregious and in Violation of Federal Standard
In a sharp rebuke of California’s controversial sex education standards, the Trump administration’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has formally warned the state to eliminate “egregious” gender ideology from its curriculum—or risk losing vital federal funding.
The warning came from the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), a division of HHS responsible for overseeing programs that serve vulnerable youth and families. Federal officials cited content in California’s public school curriculum that encourages children to question their biological sex and promotes gender identity ideology starting in elementary school.
Such content, the letter claims, is in direct violation of federal guidelines requiring age-appropriate, evidence-based, and non-ideological instruction.
“After requesting, receiving, and reviewing California’s PREP materials, ACF uncovered egregious content teaching young students that gender identity is distinct from biological sex and that boys can identify as girls,” the letter stated. “The educational materials promoting gender ideology have nothing to do with Personal Responsibility Education and are outside the scope of PREP’s authorizing statute.”
Faith leaders and parental rights advocates welcomed the move, saying the federal government is finally stepping in where the state has trampled on parental authority and common sense.
“The Trump Administration will not tolerate the use of federal funds for programs that indoctrinate our children,” said Acting Assistant Secretary Andrew Gradison. “The disturbing gender ideology content in California’s PREP materials is both unacceptable and well outside the program’s core purpose. ACF remains committed to radical transparency and providing accountability so that parents know what their children are being taught in schools.”
The curriculum in question stems from California’s Health Education Framework, which has long been under fire for promoting topics such as gender fluidity, sexual identity, and “transition journeys” to students as young as third grade. Critics say the content is not only ideologically charged but often bypasses parental knowledge or consent.
Parental rights groups across the country have increasingly sounded the alarm.
While the state has not yet issued an official response, progressive education groups have argued that the curriculum is designed to create inclusive environments for LGBT youth. However, that defense is running afoul of the federal government’s standards under President Trump’s second term, and the will of parents across the country.
The situation now presents California with a stark choice: amend its curriculum—or risk losing federal education and health funds.